AI Intelligence
Recommendations
A recommendation is a proposal with its evidence attached — never an instruction. Accepting one authorises the next step in the workflow; it never lets the intelligence layer complete the outcome on its own.
Proposals
Generated from the current insight set
High impact
Addressed at this week's leadership review
Accepted and in progress
Each with a named owner and a due date
Require authorisation
Prepare the work, but stop before anything is sent
Recommendation board
Every proposal shows the measurement it rests on, the action it suggests, and the authority level needed before anything happens.
Attendance
Collect Grade 8 register exception reviews
- Measured basis
- Grade 8 attendance is 87.1% against a 92% school target, down 6.4 points over four weeks across 214 students.
- Proposed action
- Request register exception reviews from the four Grade 8 coordinators before the 13:00 cut-off, then consolidate the responses into one guardian follow-up per student.
Finance
Move 18 aged accounts onto a formal follow-up schedule
- Measured basis
- PKR 0.7M across 18 accounts is 60 or more days overdue, up 12 accounts week on week, and is 14.9% of total outstanding.
- Proposed action
- Add the 18 accounts to the finance review queue with a documented follow-up schedule. Any outbound message is drafted by the AI and released only after a finance approval.
Students
Assign one case owner per multi-domain student
- Measured basis
- 8 students in Grades 7–10 appear on both the attendance and fee watch lists, and that group has doubled in six weeks.
- Proposed action
- Assign a single named case owner to each of the 8 students so guardians receive one consolidated follow-up rather than separate attendance and fee contacts.
Attendance
Request a South Campus review pack
- Measured basis
- South Campus reports 88% attendance and 78% fee collection for a third consecutive week, with 24 open alerts.
- Proposed action
- Ask South Campus administration for a written review pack covering register exceptions and outstanding accounts, to be tabled at the weekly leadership review.
Communication
Batch-clear the oldest 12 attendance escalations
- Measured basis
- 28 drafts are waiting for approval, 21 generated in the last 24 hours, with median dwell time at 7.4 hours against a 4.1 hour baseline.
- Proposed action
- Review the 12 oldest attendance escalations as a single batch so high-priority guardian follow-up stays inside the service window.
Communication
Verify guardian contact records on gateway route GW-04
- Measured basis
- 2 of 31 messages sent today failed delivery, both on route GW-04 within an 11-minute window.
- Proposed action
- Verify the stored contact record for both families and re-route any follow-up to a confirmed channel before further reminders are released.
Attendance
Chase 51 absence records with no reason on file
- Measured basis
- 51 students have an absence today with no reason recorded — 13 with no entry at all and 38 missing a medical note.
- Proposed action
- Ask class coordinators to submit outstanding absence reasons so the register is complete before the 13:00 cut-off. This is a records-completeness task, not a disciplinary step.
AI governance in this module
Nothing below the analytics tier executes without an authorised human decision, and consequential decisions are never initiated by the intelligence layer.
Runs automatically
Proposals are generated from verified patterns on every refresh. A recommendation with no measurable basis is never produced.
Requires authorisation
Accepting a proposal authorises the AI to prepare the work — a draft, a register request, a follow-up schedule. It does not authorise contact.
Human decision only
Proposals that carry a consequence stop at a decision. Nothing on this board can be executed, sent or applied without a named person acting on it.